Distant healing, also known as spiral healing, is a controversial topic in the field of conventional and alternative medicine. This article examines the concepts and practices associated with distance healing in the light of current scientific knowledge. We discuss possible mechanisms, empirical evidence and implications for health and well-being.
Introduction
Distance healing is the ancient practice of sending healing intentions to a person at a distance, often using energetic or spiritualistic techniques. Although widely practised in certain spiritual traditions, distance healing is a subject of debate as to its effectiveness and mechanisms, as it is still poorly understood by the conventional scientific world.
Possible mechanisms
Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain long-distance healing. Some theorists suggest that subtle energy fields, such as the biomagnetic field, may facilitate the transmission of healing energy. Other hypotheses include psychological processes such as suggestion, stress reduction and modulation of the immune response.
Empirical evidence
Scientific studies have been conducted to assess the effectiveness of distance healing. A meta-analysis published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine examined 57 studies of distance healing and concluded that there were significant effects on patients' physical and mental health. However, these results must be interpreted with caution due to methodological limitations such as lack of randomization and adequate control groups.
Implications for Health and Wellness
The growing recognition of the potential effectiveness of remote healing raises important questions for modern medicine. If these practices can complement or enhance traditional medical treatments, this could have significant implications for healthcare delivery. However, further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and to assess the long-term efficacy of remote healing.
Conclusion
Long-distance healing remains a complex field, involving both science and spirituality. While empirical evidence suggests beneficial effects, further research is needed to confirm these observations and to explore the underlying mechanisms. In the meantime, it's important to take an open, integrative approach to evaluating different healing modalities and their potential for improving health and well-being.
References
1. Astin, J. A., Harkness, E., & Ernst, E. (2000). The efficacy of "distant healing": a systematic review of randomized trials. Annals of internal medicine, 132(11), 903-910.
2. Wirth, D. P. (1990). The effect of non-contact therapeutic touch on the healing rate of full thickness dermal wounds. Subtle Energies & Energy Medicine, 1(1), 1-10.
3. Sicher, F., Targ, E., Moore II, D., & Smith, H. S. (1998). A randomized double-blind study of the effect of distant healing in a population with advanced AIDS: report of a small scale study. Western Journal of Medicine, 169(6), 356.
4. Jain, S., Mills, P. J., & Bioenergy, D. (2010). Biofield therapies: helpful or full of hype? A best evidence synthesis. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(1), 1-16.
ⓒ 2017-2024 Julien Urnel - All rights reserved - Terms of use - Cookie policy - Articles - Cgv
EN 
FR